The New shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines a weed as an
herbaceous plant not valued for use or beauty, growing wild and rank, and
regarded as cumbering the ground or hindering the growth of superior
vegetation... Applied to a shrub or tree, especially to a large tree, on
account of its abundance in a district... An unprofitable, troublesome, or
noxious growth.
So weeds are just plants not valued for their beauty and
use? Some of them do actually have uses. Why is some vegetation superior to
others? Why has it been created with superiority? Should all plants not be
equal? Should we not value each plant for what it has to offer, even if it is
just a little different, maybe a bit poisonous or troublesome?
The Britannica Encyclopaedia has this to say about
weeds:
“A weed, is any plant growing
where it is not wanted. Ever since human beings first attempted the cultivation
of plants, they have had to fight the invasion by weeds into areas chosen for
crops. Some unwanted plants later were found to have virtues not originally
suspected and so were removed from the category of weeds and taken under
cultivation. Other cultivated plants, when transplanted to new climates,
escaped cultivation and became weeds. The category of weeds thus
is ever changing, and the term is a relative one.”
Thus one persons weed can be another person’s superior plant
species. We need to start making sure that we don’t classify weeds solely based
on our own opinion. It is a relative term and the plants involved can be hurt
in the process. Make sure that what you see as a weed isn’t someone else’s
rose. It is all just a matter of perspective. Learn to tolerate.
Having said that, I need to start on my weed eradication
plan... oi.
No comments:
Post a Comment